Lecture 12: Morphology II[Note: these are lightly edited versions of overheads and notes used in class. They are provided in order to help you study, but they are not a substitute for coming to class and being prepared. The notes are incomplete, and will often be hard to make sense of if you were not in class.]
Brief synopsis: in word formation, as in phonology, we need to distinguish those things which we need to memorize about words on a word-by-word basis, and those things which we do not need to memorize on a word-by-word basis, because they follow from simple word formation rules.
If the word forms that a morpheme can create are quite regular and allows the creation of new word forms, then the morpheme is said to be productive.
If the word meanings that a morpheme can create are quite regular, and do not need to be memorized ona word-by-word basis, then the morpheme is said to be predictable.
If mental dictionary contains just morphemes and rules for combining, then all rules should be entirely productive.
Entirely productive: English progressive
Productive, but with some irregular forms: English past tense
|
wanted |
kept |
|
helped |
went |
|
damaged |
sang |
|
measured |
rang |
|
governed |
hit |
|
manufactured |
sat |
Not productive, but predictable meaning, and widely available
But...
Partially productive, and only partially predictable
The suffix '-ist' seems to be productive in English, based on the fact that we can easily coin novel words using the '-ist' suffix. However, the suffix '-ist' has multiple meanings in English, corresponding to (i) "advocate of", (ii) "user of/expert in", and (iii) "detractor of". Although use (iii) is probably only a recently developed use of this morpheme, it appears to be the most productive.
Competition between different morphemes
|
-ity |
-th |
-ness |
|
|
sincere |
sincerity |
sincerth |
?sincereness |
|
chaste |
chastity |
*chasteth |
?chasteness |
|
scarce |
scarcity |
*scarceth |
scarceness |
|
curious |
curiosity |
*curiousth |
curiousness |
|
warm |
*warmity |
warmth |
warmness |
|
deep |
*deepity |
depth |
deepness |
|
wide |
*widity |
width |
wideness |
|
red |
*reddity |
*redth |
redness |
|
sick |
*sickity |
*sickth |
sickness |
|
pleasant |
*pleasantity |
*pleasanth |
pleasantness |
|
happy |
*happity |
happith |
happiness |
Generalization:
Systematic gaps
The difference between the possible and impossible forms above is phonological. All of the adjectives that allow the '-er' suffix are adjectives of one syllable, or adjectives of two syllables ending in the vowel [i]. All of the adjectives that disallow the '-er' suffix are longer.
Therefore, it seems that '-er' is productive in English, but that it is restricted to only apply to adjectives of a certain phonological size.
Why is "funner" bad (for most people)? It seems to be an adjective, and it has only one syllable. Possibility: "funner" is bad because "fun" is really a noun that is sometimes used as an adjective.
Test of this possibility: other short adjectives that are derived from nouns should also disallow the '-er' suffix. This seems to be accurate, based on the following forms:
Contents of Mental Lexicon
Fifth try...
English plural
basic/underlying morpheme
allomorphs
Environments
Comparison with printed dictionaries. Where would we expect to find a word like 'sign' in different kinds of dictionaries.
Standard dictionaries: alphabetical order, following spelling (not sounds)
Rhyming dictionaries: organized according to sounds at end of words
Thesaurus: organized according to meaning
Tip-of-the-tongue states
Category-specific anomias
a. animate vs. inanimate
b. fruits and vegetables, or furniture terms selectively impaired!
Task: Is this a word in English? Press button for "yes" or "no" as quickly as possible.
Looking up a word in the mental dictionary primes semantically related words. i.e. People are faster to judge that NURSE is a word of English if they have just read DOCTOR. This is understood to mean that looking up DOCTOR in the mental dictionary makes it easier to look up NURSE. Similar finding for DOG and CAT and thousands of other related words.
Conclusion from this: mental dictionary is semantically organized
Mental dictionary contains:
Organization: